<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter is a 1978 Fax Machine &#8211; Metcalfe&#8217;s Law and The Twitter Nielsen Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchinfluence.com/2009/05/metcalfes-law-twitter-nielsen-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchinfluence.com/2009/05/metcalfes-law-twitter-nielsen-data/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Dating</title>
		<link>http://www.searchinfluence.com/2009/05/metcalfes-law-twitter-nielsen-data/#comment-22469</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Dating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 12:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/?p=1527#comment-22469</guid>
		<description>Twitter is also a great tool for increasing traffic to youtube videos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is also a great tool for increasing traffic to youtube videos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What We&#8217;re Reading &#124; On the Radar...</title>
		<link>http://www.searchinfluence.com/2009/05/metcalfes-law-twitter-nielsen-data/#comment-22189</link>
		<dc:creator>What We&#8217;re Reading &#124; On the Radar...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/?p=1527#comment-22189</guid>
		<description>[...] Quitters – Much has been made of the Nielsen report which pegged Twitter’s retention rate at only 40%. While even at this retention rate Twitter can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quitters – Much has been made of the Nielsen report which pegged Twitter’s retention rate at only 40%. While even at this retention rate Twitter can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.searchinfluence.com/2009/05/metcalfes-law-twitter-nielsen-data/#comment-21210</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 12:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/?p=1527#comment-21210</guid>
		<description>Thanks Stever,

I am completely with you.  It was &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/mackcollier&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@MackCollier&lt;/a&gt; who made me first sign up, but like you, it wasn&#039;t until I realized the utility of having all this information in one place that it really took hold for me.

When I was working with Yellow Pages guys they would talk about the issue of launching a new phone book as one of &quot;Critical Mass&quot; (chicken and egg really), without the rich content of advertisers, no usage; without usage no advertisers.

Twitter is like that: we who are on and active have found a critical mass of other users who validate the tool&#039;s  utility.  Until everyone who signs up is able to find enough users like them to validate their usage we&#039;ll continue to see the high dropoff rates.

Will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stever,</p>
<p>I am completely with you.  It was <a href="http://twitter.com/mackcollier" rel="nofollow">@MackCollier</a> who made me first sign up, but like you, it wasn&#8217;t until I realized the utility of having all this information in one place that it really took hold for me.</p>
<p>When I was working with Yellow Pages guys they would talk about the issue of launching a new phone book as one of &#8220;Critical Mass&#8221; (chicken and egg really), without the rich content of advertisers, no usage; without usage no advertisers.</p>
<p>Twitter is like that: we who are on and active have found a critical mass of other users who validate the tool&#8217;s  utility.  Until everyone who signs up is able to find enough users like them to validate their usage we&#8217;ll continue to see the high dropoff rates.</p>
<p>Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stever</title>
		<link>http://www.searchinfluence.com/2009/05/metcalfes-law-twitter-nielsen-data/#comment-21190</link>
		<dc:creator>Stever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 06:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/?p=1527#comment-21190</guid>
		<description>Great post Will. I was a huge skeptic of Twitter till quite recently. Micro-blogging? WTF? Common, how lame is that. Flash in the pan. Then I tried it, saw all my colleagues in SEO on there, followed along the conversations, noticed how much info and links get shared (to the abandonment of my RSS feeds) and quickly saw the value. But I&#039;m one of the cool kids in the know, though late to the game.

But I can certainly see why many &quot;average&quot; users tire of it quickly. They simply use it as text messaging, sharing trivial info about their day, not sharing links or any deeper information. Exactly what I assumed it would only be till I actually got on board.

So what will it take for the average web user to delve deeper into the utility that does exist with twitter? Seeing others, that they follow, sharing links and other deeper info will get them into doing more of the same.

Twitter is still essentially in it&#039;s infancy so we&#039;ll see how well it can really penetrate into the mainstream and if it can stick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Will. I was a huge skeptic of Twitter till quite recently. Micro-blogging? WTF? Common, how lame is that. Flash in the pan. Then I tried it, saw all my colleagues in SEO on there, followed along the conversations, noticed how much info and links get shared (to the abandonment of my RSS feeds) and quickly saw the value. But I&#8217;m one of the cool kids in the know, though late to the game.</p>
<p>But I can certainly see why many &#8220;average&#8221; users tire of it quickly. They simply use it as text messaging, sharing trivial info about their day, not sharing links or any deeper information. Exactly what I assumed it would only be till I actually got on board.</p>
<p>So what will it take for the average web user to delve deeper into the utility that does exist with twitter? Seeing others, that they follow, sharing links and other deeper info will get them into doing more of the same.</p>
<p>Twitter is still essentially in it&#8217;s infancy so we&#8217;ll see how well it can really penetrate into the mainstream and if it can stick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

