<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Natpal, Doppleganger Sites And Other Counter-Productive Marketing Techniques</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchinfluence.com/2007/06/natpal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchinfluence.com/2007/06/natpal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazmin Tittl</title>
		<link>http://www.searchinfluence.com/2007/06/natpal/#comment-379034</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazmin Tittl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 16:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/blog/2007/06/natpal/#comment-379034</guid>
		<description>Privacy doesn&#039;t do anything for you from my experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Privacy doesn&#8217;t do anything for you from my experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yelp Makes Small Businesses Scream &#124; Website Promotion is not Voodoo</title>
		<link>http://www.searchinfluence.com/2007/06/natpal/#comment-12821</link>
		<dc:creator>Yelp Makes Small Businesses Scream &#124; Website Promotion is not Voodoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 03:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/blog/2007/06/natpal/#comment-12821</guid>
		<description>[...] and you don&#8217;t fall for a slick sales pitch from the likes of SEOMatrix, Yodle (formerly Natpal), or LinksHog (or one of their hundred other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and you don&#8217;t fall for a slick sales pitch from the likes of SEOMatrix, Yodle (formerly Natpal), or LinksHog (or one of their hundred other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing for Plastic Surgeons - Less Scary than You Think &#124; Website Promotion is not Voodoo</title>
		<link>http://www.searchinfluence.com/2007/06/natpal/#comment-11564</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing for Plastic Surgeons - Less Scary than You Think &#124; Website Promotion is not Voodoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/blog/2007/06/natpal/#comment-11564</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve already posted about our use of call-tracking numbers. Honestly, we want to know what&#8217;s working. Since we don&#8217;t have a directory and we&#8217;re not a one-trick pony PPC aggregator we have some latitude. We don&#8217;t have a property in which we need to outrank you. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve already posted about our use of call-tracking numbers. Honestly, we want to know what&#8217;s working. Since we don&#8217;t have a directory and we&#8217;re not a one-trick pony PPC aggregator we have some latitude. We don&#8217;t have a property in which we need to outrank you. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Convert Offline - Everybody&#8217;s Doing It &#124; Website Promotion is not Voodoo</title>
		<link>http://www.searchinfluence.com/2007/06/natpal/#comment-11134</link>
		<dc:creator>Convert Offline - Everybody&#8217;s Doing It &#124; Website Promotion is not Voodoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/blog/2007/06/natpal/#comment-11134</guid>
		<description>[...] To be clear, we did this on their site.Â  Using simple PHP and Javascript we avoided mirroring their site and the only change was the phone number. After 2 months we made a decision&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To be clear, we did this on their site.Â  Using simple PHP and Javascript we avoided mirroring their site and the only change was the phone number. After 2 months we made a decision&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wscott</title>
		<link>http://www.searchinfluence.com/2007/06/natpal/#comment-7113</link>
		<dc:creator>wscott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/blog/2007/06/natpal/#comment-7113</guid>
		<description>Jonathon,

Thanks for your comments!

I appreciate the feedback and only wish I had more time to get what&#039;s between my ears onto the screen.

Thanks again,
Will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathon,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments!</p>
<p>I appreciate the feedback and only wish I had more time to get what&#8217;s between my ears onto the screen.</p>
<p>Thanks again,<br />
Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Haynes</title>
		<link>http://www.searchinfluence.com/2007/06/natpal/#comment-6783</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/blog/2007/06/natpal/#comment-6783</guid>
		<description>This is a good blog...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good blog&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Haynes</title>
		<link>http://www.searchinfluence.com/2007/06/natpal/#comment-6782</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/blog/2007/06/natpal/#comment-6782</guid>
		<description>Hey Court, what do you mean by &quot;this issue was raised to us recently by a client, at which time we changed our policy for new sites.&quot;  Are you serious?  So NatPal is out there building a search practice for SME&#039;s and you guys did not understand the need for robot.txt?  Hello McFly!  I don&#039;t doubt your intentions, but I will tell you, even the yellow page companies that sell clicks know better...  Not to impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Court, what do you mean by &#8220;this issue was raised to us recently by a client, at which time we changed our policy for new sites.&#8221;  Are you serious?  So NatPal is out there building a search practice for SME&#8217;s and you guys did not understand the need for robot.txt?  Hello McFly!  I don&#8217;t doubt your intentions, but I will tell you, even the yellow page companies that sell clicks know better&#8230;  Not to impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRH Solutions Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Natpal Case Study</title>
		<link>http://www.searchinfluence.com/2007/06/natpal/#comment-6561</link>
		<dc:creator>PRH Solutions Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Natpal Case Study</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/blog/2007/06/natpal/#comment-6561</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.searchinfluence.com/blog/2007/06/natpal/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.searchinfluence.com/blog/2007/06/natpal/" rel="nofollow">http://www.searchinfluence.com/blog/2007/06/natpal/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natpal CEO Court Cunningham Steps Up &#124; Website Promotion is not Voodoo</title>
		<link>http://www.searchinfluence.com/2007/06/natpal/#comment-5036</link>
		<dc:creator>Natpal CEO Court Cunningham Steps Up &#124; Website Promotion is not Voodoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/blog/2007/06/natpal/#comment-5036</guid>
		<description>[...] Court Cunningham, the CEO of NatPal, has been incredibly quick in responding to my earlier post in which I was critical of NatPal&#8217;s handling of mirror sites. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Court Cunningham, the CEO of NatPal, has been incredibly quick in responding to my earlier post in which I was critical of NatPal&#8217;s handling of mirror sites. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Court Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://www.searchinfluence.com/2007/06/natpal/#comment-5022</link>
		<dc:creator>Court Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchinfluence.com/blog/2007/06/natpal/#comment-5022</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your thoughtful post on this subject.  NatPal is committed to driving as many online leads for our clients as possible, and we would never intentionally reduce the performance of their SEO efforts. 
Our policy has recently changed to require the use of robots.txt tag on all new duplicate sites, and we are in the process of implementing this across our hundreds of customers. 

Some background:
As a marketing lead generation provider to the SMB market, we found that most of our clients did not have an existing website.  As part of delivering our online lead generation service, we also build for them, at a nominal cost, their primary website.  In this case there is no issue, since there is no duplicate content.

Given our 50% quarter over quarter growth rate we are increasingly starting to work with clients who do have an existing website.  As a result of our growth in this segment,  this issue was raised to us recently by a client, at which time we changed our policy for new sites.

We have only one mission, driving more leads at a reasonable price for our clients.  We succeed when they succeed.  We have in the past and will continue to adjust our tactics to ensure we succeed in this mission.

Thanks

Court Cunningham
CEO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your thoughtful post on this subject.  NatPal is committed to driving as many online leads for our clients as possible, and we would never intentionally reduce the performance of their SEO efforts.<br />
Our policy has recently changed to require the use of robots.txt tag on all new duplicate sites, and we are in the process of implementing this across our hundreds of customers. </p>
<p>Some background:<br />
As a marketing lead generation provider to the SMB market, we found that most of our clients did not have an existing website.  As part of delivering our online lead generation service, we also build for them, at a nominal cost, their primary website.  In this case there is no issue, since there is no duplicate content.</p>
<p>Given our 50% quarter over quarter growth rate we are increasingly starting to work with clients who do have an existing website.  As a result of our growth in this segment,  this issue was raised to us recently by a client, at which time we changed our policy for new sites.</p>
<p>We have only one mission, driving more leads at a reasonable price for our clients.  We succeed when they succeed.  We have in the past and will continue to adjust our tactics to ensure we succeed in this mission.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Court Cunningham<br />
CEO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

